Comments on: Obama’s Economic Stimulus Program http://barackobamasucks.net/2009/02/14/obamas-economic-stimulus-program/ Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:29:24 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: Trembleman http://barackobamasucks.net/2009/02/14/obamas-economic-stimulus-program/comment-page-2/#comment-10801 Trembleman Sat, 14 Aug 2010 02:14:48 +0000 http://barackobamasucks.net/?p=207#comment-10801 Lighten up, man! Pass the organic potato chips and hydro-ecologized guacamole! Lighten up, man! Pass the organic potato chips and hydro-ecologized guacamole!

]]> By: Trembleman http://barackobamasucks.net/2009/02/14/obamas-economic-stimulus-program/comment-page-2/#comment-10759 Trembleman Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:45:55 +0000 http://barackobamasucks.net/?p=207#comment-10759 That is precisely what this Administration wants...to force people to become completely dependent upon The Fed, using the argument that "if we were,'t there to help you, you'd be on the street!" That is precisely what this Administration wants…to force people to become completely dependent upon The Fed, using the argument that "if we were,'t there to help you, you'd be on the street!"

]]> By: Trembleman http://barackobamasucks.net/2009/02/14/obamas-economic-stimulus-program/comment-page-5/#comment-10688 Trembleman Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:31:00 +0000 http://barackobamasucks.net/?p=207#comment-10688 The One's Shamulus Bill has proven to be anathema to the economy, as predicted by myself, CC, and many other contributors to this forum. There are many Americans who supported neither The One nor his deceptive sales pitch, and their discontent is spreading, as evidenced by the aforementioned's sinking poll numbers. Hard to believe that some of the BM (Big Media) outlets actually reported these stats. The One's Shamulus Bill has proven to be anathema to the economy, as predicted by myself, CC, and many other contributors to this forum. There are many Americans who supported neither The One nor his deceptive sales pitch, and their discontent is spreading, as evidenced by the aforementioned's sinking poll numbers. Hard to believe that some of the BM (Big Media) outlets actually reported these stats.

]]> By: Trembleman http://barackobamasucks.net/2009/02/14/obamas-economic-stimulus-program/comment-page-4/#comment-10588 Trembleman Wed, 23 Jun 2010 02:38:16 +0000 http://barackobamasucks.net/?p=207#comment-10588 Speaking of "heads," why don't you use yours? Giving the Fed more money for free health care (for people who don't care to support themselves) and other assorted liberal agenda items hurts the foundation upon which our country was founded. Excessive taxation deprives individuals of the dignity of personal choice. For an "alledgly" commentator, you don't appear to have much economic nor historical know-how. Speaking of "heads," why don't you use yours? Giving the Fed more money for free health care (for people who don't care to support themselves) and other assorted liberal agenda items hurts the foundation upon which our country was founded. Excessive taxation deprives individuals of the dignity of personal choice. For an "alledgly" commentator, you don't appear to have much economic nor historical know-how.

]]> By: Trembleman http://barackobamasucks.net/2009/02/14/obamas-economic-stimulus-program/comment-page-3/#comment-10570 Trembleman Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:41:37 +0000 http://barackobamasucks.net/?p=207#comment-10570 The One's minions have set their alarms on "permanent snooze"...now that he is in the White House, they're allowing him to do all their thinking for them. The One's minions have set their alarms on "permanent snooze"…now that he is in the White House, they're allowing him to do all their thinking for them.

]]> By: Trembleman http://barackobamasucks.net/2009/02/14/obamas-economic-stimulus-program/comment-page-3/#comment-10564 Trembleman Wed, 16 Jun 2010 04:05:54 +0000 http://barackobamasucks.net/?p=207#comment-10564 Well said. Well said.

]]> By: ChimpChump http://barackobamasucks.net/2009/02/14/obamas-economic-stimulus-program/comment-page-3/#comment-10561 ChimpChump Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:52:28 +0000 http://barackobamasucks.net/?p=207#comment-10561 Tom, Great post. You laid out very succinctly, the reasons why this jack-ass won the election. In a word: white guilt. Tom,

Great post. You laid out very succinctly, the reasons why this jack-ass won the election. In a word: white guilt.

]]> By: Trembleman http://barackobamasucks.net/2009/02/14/obamas-economic-stimulus-program/comment-page-4/#comment-10556 Trembleman Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:21:25 +0000 http://barackobamasucks.net/?p=207#comment-10556 Let's see. The One has his fingers on the purse strings right now, so beyond keeping a stiff upper lip and supporting his detractors in local and state-wide elections or writing him a letter directly, our power is temporarily limited. We must keep our eyes open for the soonest chance to replace him in the next presidential election, and ensure we have a winning candidate ready to take the reins in 2012. Let's see. The One has his fingers on the purse strings right now, so beyond keeping a stiff upper lip and supporting his detractors in local and state-wide elections or writing him a letter directly, our power is temporarily limited. We must keep our eyes open for the soonest chance to replace him in the next presidential election, and ensure we have a winning candidate ready to take the reins in 2012.

]]> By: Thomas http://barackobamasucks.net/2009/02/14/obamas-economic-stimulus-program/comment-page-4/#comment-10555 Thomas Sat, 12 Jun 2010 06:25:41 +0000 http://barackobamasucks.net/?p=207#comment-10555 Evidently, Bush did well enough in the first 4 to get reelected, with the popular vote this time, so the problem couldn't have been then. And he had a Democratic Congress for the last two years of his presidency, so it couldn't have been there, right? So obviously he either screwed up majorly during years 5 & 6, or he inherited something that led to this. What could it be? I mean I know that Clinton deregulated a lot of the economy while he was in office, with his pants on. Could that be it? Is it possible that this leads back to a Democratic president? I mean after all, if the Left can blame Bush for all of Obama's problems, surely we can blame Bush's problems on Clinton. Evidently, Bush did well enough in the first 4 to get reelected, with the popular vote this time, so the problem couldn't have been then. And he had a Democratic Congress for the last two years of his presidency, so it couldn't have been there, right? So obviously he either screwed up majorly during years 5 & 6, or he inherited something that led to this. What could it be? I mean I know that Clinton deregulated a lot of the economy while he was in office, with his pants on. Could that be it? Is it possible that this leads back to a Democratic president? I mean after all, if the Left can blame Bush for all of Obama's problems, surely we can blame Bush's problems on Clinton.

]]> By: Thomas http://barackobamasucks.net/2009/02/14/obamas-economic-stimulus-program/comment-page-3/#comment-10554 Thomas Sat, 12 Jun 2010 06:16:46 +0000 http://barackobamasucks.net/?p=207#comment-10554 1) We had just left 8 years with Bush, during which we kept safe enough for all of the protesters to be able to spout their hippy propaganda. 2) Many people simply wanted to make history by electing the first Black POTUS 3) He has the support of most of Hollywood, which gave him a quick in with many of our country's most impressionable minds. 4) He had a campaign fund that was easily twice as large as McCain's 5) He had the favor of most media outlets on paper, online, and on screen. 6) He is a very charismatic, smooth speaker (when he has a teleprompter or three) 7) He was supported by most non-Caucasian demographics, and at portion of them voted for him because he was the non-Caucasian candidate 8) The only people that opposed him were GOP party-liners, who don't look at names on ballots, people who looked at what he said, rather than how he said it, and admittedly people that had a single major issue with him (this issue could have ranged from gun laws to same-sex marriage laws-to race to abortion laws) You are right. There were a lot of factors going into his victory, and not a single one of them had anything to do with good policies. 1) We had just left 8 years with Bush, during which we kept safe enough for all of the protesters to be able to spout their hippy propaganda.
2) Many people simply wanted to make history by electing the first Black POTUS
3) He has the support of most of Hollywood, which gave him a quick in with many of our country's most impressionable minds.
4) He had a campaign fund that was easily twice as large as McCain's
5) He had the favor of most media outlets on paper, online, and on screen.
6) He is a very charismatic, smooth speaker (when he has a teleprompter or three)
7) He was supported by most non-Caucasian demographics, and at portion of them voted for him because he was the non-Caucasian candidate 8) The only people that opposed him were GOP party-liners, who don't look at names on ballots, people who looked at what he said, rather than how he said it, and admittedly people that had a single major issue with him (this issue could have ranged from gun laws to same-sex marriage laws-to race to abortion laws)
You are right. There were a lot of factors going into his victory, and not a single one of them had anything to do with good policies.

]]>