14 October 2008
Lawsuit To Remove Obama – New Video Release
Posted by Administrator under: Obama Sucks! .
This video is courtesy of Attorney Philip Berg and Illuminati Pictures. It is an excellent video that should be seen by every American. Please spread the word!
113 Comments so far...
Sofa King Ray Todd Ed Says:
15 October 2008 at 1:12 AM.
Phillip Berg also believes our government conspired in the 9/11 tragedy by wiring the world trade center with explosives, waiting for the planes to hit it, then blowing up the buildings and blaming it on the terrorists. If we didn’t have videos of the planes hitting the trade center, I’m sure he would be claiming that it wasn’t planes at all, lol.
Ray Says:
15 October 2008 at 6:27 PM.
Incredible! Good job, Admin. THIS is much better that some of your other videos. I wasn’t a big advocate of persuing the birth certificate issue, but this is somewhat convincing. All I need now is for an Obama supporter to completely dismiss the issue by saying it’s a drummed up conspiracy and tell me that I’m a sheep for even remotely considering this to be true.
I do wonder, however, if Obama could be using this issue as political bait. McCain would look pretty silly (and desperate) if he suggested Obama was not a natural born citizen, only to have him produce a legit certificate. It would certainly discredit McCain’s ability to be well-informed.
Either way, if the man hasn’t provided proof of birth, something is up.
God Help Us All Says:
15 October 2008 at 7:59 PM.
What’s the use in doing all of these videos when no one sees them and whats worse no one seems to care….
I am so scared this man is going to be voted in by the blind….
Ray Says:
15 October 2008 at 9:56 PM.
Sofa, once again…I have to say you’re right, however, even a broken clock is right twice a day. He may be a loon, but don’t get distracted…he makes a justifiable point that has yet to be addressed.
Josh Muncy Says:
16 October 2008 at 1:35 AM.
No one who looks at this objectively can say nothing funny is going on. If Obama truly has nothing to hide then why not produce the records? Shut everyone down and leave the issue behind? I flat out do not like Obama or what he stands for.
Jonathan Rochele Says:
16 October 2008 at 4:22 AM.
You are all fucking retarded!!!! And you lost!!!!!!!!!!!! What now? Don’t worry, you have four years to ponder youor next losing chance
Scott Says:
16 October 2008 at 12:22 PM.
Unfortunately, we will all have four years to ponder this catastrophe, yourself included, if we hand the leadership of our great nation over to this man. Mark my words, Jonathon and others who are either disillusioned or uninformed as you are, if you waste your vote on this man, you will live to regret it.
Yaya Yanes Says:
16 October 2008 at 1:09 PM.
This is UN-BELIEVABLE!!!!!!!! Barack Obama should be 86′d off the Ballot IMMEDIATEALY! He’s not eligible to be President or qualified for that matter. What an ASSHOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
My vote will hopefully cancel out a vote for him!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mike Valli Says:
16 October 2008 at 4:19 PM.
Barak Sadam Hussein Obama is for change. That’s why when he is asked about his past, he lies. Then to cover his ass he CHANGES to another lie then another layer of bull shit. His past associations speak volumes about his hate for America and intolerance for the white race.
Cousin Vinney JD Says:
16 October 2008 at 4:29 PM.
Obama is the Ayatollah of CHANGE. Change you will sumit to.
charity Says:
16 October 2008 at 5:03 PM.
yesterday was the 15th…so did obama show prouf of birth or not?
Barack obama rocks! Says:
16 October 2008 at 6:58 PM.
you are just making some **** up! you don’t have any proof at all! all your sentences start with “I believe…”we don’t really care what you believe, how about you find some facts first and then state your opinion! you are just a racist idiot!
Sofa King Ray Todd Ed Says:
16 October 2008 at 8:29 PM.
If you look at Berg’s lawsuit, it is mostly rumor, innuendo, and gossip. I think Obama is smart to ignore it as much as he can until after the election. It is baseless but would become a distraction if he started down that slippery slope.
Obama was born in Hawaii, he has posted the birth certificate online. Here is what politifact says … “To verify we did indeed have the correct document, we contacted the Hawaii Department of Health, which maintains such records. “It’s a valid Hawaii state birth certificate,” spokesman Janice Okubo said June 13, 2008, after we e-mailed her our copy.”
US law does not allow a child to lose citizenship based on any action by their parents. As long as the child is residing in the US by age 25, their citizenship is intact, even if the parent gave up their citizenship. So the whole Indonesia crap wont fly. Berg is trying to assert that Indonesian law (not allowing duel citizenship) takes precedence over US law, which is a warped interpretation.
Barack never took action on the Kenya citizenship and the ability to become a Kenya citizen based on his father’s citizenship expired in the mid-1980′s. This means that since he never asserted his right to become a Kenya citizen, he never became a Kenya citizen and he lost his right to ever assert Kenya citizenship based on his father’s citizenship.
Game over people. Move along, there is nothing to see here.
Just Think Says:
17 October 2008 at 12:38 PM.
That’s right Sofa, There is nothing here!……
You people are compleatly DISGUSTING, and utterly PATHETIC!!!!
If you don’t really like the guy,.. so be it, …….who cairs……But don’t make **** up!
Are you people scared?……..Well you should look at McCain’s background, that should scare you ,…And if that doesn’t do it Palin’s will!!
Maybe you people are just to lazy or …. to retarded, To do any background check’s!
Webster Says:
17 October 2008 at 4:22 PM.
Even if he is a citizen. Why would you want somwone who was born in Hawaii, moved to Indonesia and Kenya or wherever the heck he has been, and he wont even abide to the pledge of ALLEGIANCE to our country. Why anyone would want this man as our president is out of my mind!
Johnny Gleason Says:
17 October 2008 at 8:14 PM.
I don’t want NO FUCKING NIGGER for MY President!
Just Think Says:
17 October 2008 at 9:21 PM.
Webster……..
You are another Parrot, who squak’s everything they here, and don’t bother to factcheck for the truth!
Obama does put his hand over his heart, for the pledge of allegiance!
What you are refering to is the National Anthem, and putting your hand over your heart is not a requirement.
Johnny Gleason……………Why?……………….What Are you afriad of?
God made us one and all.
Brian Says:
18 October 2008 at 10:59 PM.
He wasn’t born in Hawaii. He was born in Kenya. The BC is fake. His mother was too pregnant for the airline to allow her to fly home. So he was born in Kenya and later registered in Hawaii. The Obama’s have mistakenly give two hospitals and the BC has no seal. Type in Africna Press and read their website or go to WND.com and read theirs and then check the links.
Brian Says:
18 October 2008 at 11:01 PM.
Bottom line, no matter how you look at it. He is not a natural born citizen. At best he is a naturalized because he was a citizen of Indonesia. There is no dual citizenship in Indonesia so Barrack would have to take the oath and be naturalized. Being naturalized means you are not constitutionally qualifed to be President of the United States
Andjustice4all Says:
19 October 2008 at 4:51 PM.
Don’t you think that the State Department would have discredited Obama from even filing for candidacy in the primaries if he was not a natural-born citizen? I see this as just another tactic by Steve Schmidt and the GOP to dissuade voters from voting for Obama. It’s sad that the McCain campaign will do ANYTHING to get elected.
gordon Says:
19 October 2008 at 7:06 PM.
I’ve had it! he cant eve produce a BC and he’s runnin for president..god help all the people who believe in him and his BS
Just Think Says:
19 October 2008 at 8:09 PM.
Brian………
You are WRONG…
Obama is a United States Citizen, according to U.S. Department.
Claims that the Document lacks a raised seal or a signature are FALSE!
Claims that Obama was born in Kenya FALSE!
Please you guys, go to a reputable web site before you make such claims.
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html
brett Says:
20 October 2008 at 6:39 PM.
this guy in the video is not very intelligent. How can someone come up with so many un-true and un-verified “facts”. This guy is a looney
Uncle Sam Says:
21 October 2008 at 1:23 AM.
CHANGE
COME HELP A NIGGER GET ELECTED!
Lisa Says:
21 October 2008 at 2:28 AM.
AMERICANS!
Wake UP!
Factcheck.org—is owned by who?
Owned by Annenburg Corp—who owns this?
Wim Ayres + his Partner–who?
Right-
Barrack Hussein Obama!
Enough said!
He is a FRAUD!
WHATABOUT THIS??? Says:
21 October 2008 at 3:05 AM.
check ou howard sterns interview of people voting for obama.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5p3OB6roAg
Nate Says:
21 October 2008 at 12:13 PM.
reached 10s of millions, huh? So far this video has been viewed over 5,000 times…WHOOPIDIDOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Boricuas for McCain Palin Says:
21 October 2008 at 6:54 PM.
Lisa! You beat me to it.
Thanks
sam Says:
21 October 2008 at 9:15 PM.
well, look at it this way. Obama has false claims against him and John McCain killed people in Vietnam. What is worse?
cardo Says:
22 October 2008 at 3:37 PM.
Wow. It’s so sad that kids these days vote for the candidate their pop heros tell them to like. Acorn, Heirs, no evidence of citizenship, brainwashed marxist followers. Our veterans would be so ashamed.
bluto Says:
22 October 2008 at 6:50 PM.
i would have thought you lemming libs would like shorter bread & cheese lines, if your idiots vote for that muslim, your place in line will be a little farther back, cause we are used to getting up early for the jobs we lost from increased taxes on the small business, sooo, when you get there we will already be in line in front of you cause you are used to sleeping in. HA, he screwed you too……….dumb ass
Sofa King Ray Todd Ed Says:
22 October 2008 at 11:50 PM.
blue toe, after Obama is elected I will expect you to stand in line for me and get my bread and cheese in the morning and bring it to my house. We lemming libs are too smart to have to go stand in line when we have lots of (very) stupid neocons that are used to getting up early anyway.
Anyone who thinks that our country can borrow another trillion dollars and not have both taxes go up and services go down is probably stupid enough to be manipulated into getting my cheese and bread in the morning. Oh, and by the way, I would also like coffee and a wall street journal, and please be quiet and just leave it by the front door, in case I decide to sleep in. Chop chop, times a wasting.
Wake Up Says:
23 October 2008 at 3:35 AM.
All he is asked to do is produce a birth certifiate and show it to a judge, pretty simple. What does he do? Hire a lawyer and stall. Wake up people he is not eligible to be the President of the United States of America according to our Constitution. We are headed for a constitutional crisis. The DNC beter nominate another candidate pretty quick because I’m a democrate and I don’t want to waste my vote.
Dave Says:
23 October 2008 at 9:20 AM.
One thing is for certain, if Obama loses the blacks with riot, and if he WINS they will riot too! They’ll probably burn their own houses down.
closed minded redneck! Says:
23 October 2008 at 12:59 PM.
after this election the democrats will use the constitution for toilet paper !
HELLO Says:
23 October 2008 at 1:20 PM.
also not elligable to run. Why can’t Obama just give the birth certificate? Is he trying to hide something?
HELLO Says:
23 October 2008 at 1:23 PM.
Why isn’t McCain all over this? Where is the press? If this was the truth then where is everyone and why can’t the press just deal with it so we can know the truth.
HELLO Says:
23 October 2008 at 1:25 PM.
Hey Sofa, you CAN put fake crap on the internet and say it’s true. you need to learn a lot more I’m very young in high school and I can tell that.
HELLO Says:
23 October 2008 at 1:28 PM.
One more things sofa, his mother was 18 when she had Obama correct? You have to have been residing in the U.S. for 10 years after the age of 16 to apply for natural citizenship which is not the case for Barack’s mother.
TC Says:
23 October 2008 at 3:44 PM.
Dave your hilarious!!! And the best is, it would probably improove the scenery
Cortney Says:
23 October 2008 at 5:07 PM.
Even if Obama was born in Kenya, he would still be a citizen of the United States. His mother Ann Dunham, was born in Kansas, making her an American citizen. In order for a person to be considered a citizen of the United States, as says the constitution they simply need to have a parent who is a U.S. citizen. The constitution states, “Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national.” So if Mr. Philip Berg is so obsessed with following the constitution shouldn’t he know that? As for the comment about Indonesia and Obama losing his citizenship is completely false. No matter what conflict is going on, the only way that a person can lose their citizenship is to be deported. And if you are deported you are not allowed back into the country. Frankly, Attorney Philip Berg is retarded and everyone who buys into his lame bullshit is just as retarded as he is.
bluto Says:
23 October 2008 at 6:43 PM.
well sofa kling on (dingle berry) if you wait for me to bring you anything, ya got a long wait, sounds like you are a frustraited person sent in to this den of osama haters by your handlers to try to lobotomize one of us American self thinkers with your same ole tactics, i feel sorry for you, let me put down my gun and head off to church and pray for you……..dumb ass
HELLO Says:
23 October 2008 at 7:16 PM.
Cortney, this is not true if your not born in the U.S. and your parent was, your parent would have had to of reside in the U.S. and be a citizen for 10 years in order to apply for their child to be a natural citizen. Obviosly you need to look up your lfacts and put down your references, because it’s not true. And it is true about the Indonesia because if you look it up so you don’t look like an idiot you would see that it is a correct statement. Why else wouldn’t Obama present his birth certificate. He doesn’t have to show anything because he’s black and it would be considered racisit if anyone questioned him making things truely unfair. Get you facts straight.
Sofa King Ray Todd Ed Says:
23 October 2008 at 9:53 PM.
Hello, anyone born on US soil is a natural born US citizen. Obama was born in Hawaii so he is a citizen. You are trying to apply a law that is used for people born outside the US. I know it gets confusing, but anyone born on US soil is a US citizen, even if neither of their parents are, and even if the mother just illegally climbed the Mexico-US fence and had the kid as she dropped to the ground. McCain is in a gray area, clearly he is a citizen, but as to whether or not he is natural born is open to debate.
GOPER Says:
23 October 2008 at 11:46 PM.
It’s a sad day in America when the country is so blind sided that it would vote for a fucking nigger!!!! And a fucking muslim at that. If something is dug up on Obama, the liberal media won’t report it, but, By God, if McCain or Palin does something, then those liberal bastards of the media are all over it. And also, fuck all of the Hollywood motherfuckers who support this fucking muslim!!!!
GOPER Says:
24 October 2008 at 12:09 AM.
sorry for the cursing, very tasteless, but I am just frustrated with all of this Obama crap, America needs to remember 911. It has nothing to do with Obama being a black man but I didn’t like John Kerry either, he was kind of a tool. Things are just real scary for the gopers right now….again, I apologize for my barrage of profanity.
Hussein_Dishonorable Says:
24 October 2008 at 3:11 AM.
All due respect Sofa King there is no gray area. This was settled years and years ago probably before either of us were born. Children of military members on duty as ordered, who are born on a military base (considered U.S. territory) are Natural Born Citizens. Just as (your example)someone whose parents are not US citizens, but is born on US soil is a natural born citizen. Hence illegal aliens having “anchor babies” to stay here. My only issue is with those people who support Hussein…. They are SofaKing Retarded!
Me: I was trained (well) to hunt down and hang people named Hussein, not vote for them. This is the most dangerous time in US history, and idiots all the over the country are so mad at Bush that they are willing to toss America aside and vote for a Hussein. I understand people and their dislike of the current administration, but what are they thinking going so far out of the norm and voting for someone they know nothing about? Just because he has a (D) after his name?… Give me a break! Do they really feel that guilty for slavery, 143 years later? This has gone way beyond anything I could have ever imagined. We are going from the far far right to the far far left. What we need is a nice middle of the road guy like Bill Clinton to heal this rift between us and get the citizens of this nation together again. I’m sorry to inform you, but Hussein will not accomplish that. It is going to get a lot worse if he is elected.
Juat Think Says:
24 October 2008 at 2:18 PM.
HUSSEIN_DISHONORABLE…..You are insanely dishonorable!
First of all, race or slavery has nothing to do with why most people are voting for Obama!
Secondly,.. Hussein is only a name,.. it can’t hurt you!… There is so much more to Obama then skin color, or a name,.. you obviously have never lesson to any of his speeches.
Maybe, Obama being a Democrat, may play a part in it yes, but only because the Republicans haven’t done a very good job in the past 8yrs, now have they?…
I don’t care what Obama’s middle name is, or the color of his skin;.. I care about what he believes in, and what he will offer to this Great Country of ours!
I do not see that in McCain,…And you my friend are the retarded one!
On Another note…
I think it’s safe to say, that most of the people on this website fall into the middle class. (Ecumenically speaking) McCain’s ecumenical plan will not benefit the middle class. McCain’s plan has led us to where we are today, and has proven not to work,.. yet most of you will vote for McCain.
Obama’s ecumenical plan clearly helps the backbone of our country the middle class. Obama’s ecumenical plan is exactly what this Country needs at this time of ecumenic crises.
I don’t understand why you people don’t see that!?
HUSSEIN_DISHONORABLE…..You are insanely dishonorable!
First of all, race or slavery has nothing to do with why most people are voting for Obama!
Secondly,.. Hussein is only a name,.. it can’t hurt you!… There is so much more to Obama then skin color, or a name,.. you obviously have never lesson to any of his speeches.
Maybe, Obama being a Democrat, may play a part in it yes, but only because the Republicans haven’t done a very good job in the past 8yrs, now have they?…
I don’t care what Obama’s middle name is, or the color of his skin;.. I care about what he believes in, and what he will offer to this Great Country of ours!
I do not see that in McCain,…And you my friend are the retarded one!
On Another note…
I think it’s safe to say, that most of the people on this website fall into the middle class. (Ecumenically speaking) McCain’s ecumenical plan will not benefit the middle class. McCain’s plan has led us to where we are today, and has proven not to work,.. yet most of you will vote for McCain.
Obama’s ecumenical plan clearly helps the backbone of our country the middle class. Obama’s ecumenical plan is exactly what this Country needs at this time of ecumenic crises.
I don’t understand why you people don’t see that!?
HUSSEIN_DISHONORABLE…..You are insanely dishonorable!
First of all, race or slavery has nothing to do with why most people are voting for Obama!
Secondly,.. Hussein is only a name,.. it can’t hurt you!… There is so much more to Obama then skin color, or a name,.. you obviously have never lesson to any of his speeches.
Maybe, Obama being a Democrat, may play a part in it yes, but only because the Republicans haven’t done a very good job in the past 8yrs, now have they?…
I don’t care what Obama’s middle name is, or the color of his skin;.. I care about what he believes in, and what he will offer to this Great Country of ours!
I do not see that in McCain,…And you my friend are the retarded one!
On Another note…
I think it’s safe to say, that most of the people on this website fall into the middle class. (Ecumenically speaking) McCain’s ecumenical plan will not benefit the middle class. McCain’s plan has led us to where we are today, and has proven not to work,.. yet most of you will vote for McCain.
Obama’s ecumenical plan clearly helps the backbone of our country the middle class. Obama’s ecumenical plan is exactly what this Country needs at this time of ecumenic crises.
I don’t understand why you people don’t see that!?
HUSSEIN_DISHONORABLE…..You are insanely dishonorable!
First of all, race or slavery has nothing to do with why most people are voting for Obama!
Secondly,.. Hussein is only a name,.. it can’t hurt you!… There is so much more to Obama then skin color, or a name,.. you obviously have never lesson to any of his speeches.
Maybe, Obama being a Democrat, may play a part in it yes, but only because the Republicans haven’t done a very good job in the past 8yrs, now have they?…
I don’t care what Obama’s middle name is, or the color of his skin;.. I care about what he believes in, and what he will offer to this Great Country of ours!
I do not see that in McCain,…And you my friend are the retarded one!
On Another note…
I think it’s safe to say, that most of the people on this website fall into the middle class. (Ecumenically speaking) McCain’s ecumenical plan will not benefit the middle class. McCain’s plan has led us to where we are today, and has proven not to work,.. yet most of you will vote for McCain.
Obama’s ecumenical plan clearly helps the backbone of our country the middle class. Obama’s ecumenical plan is exactly what this Country needs at this time of ecumenic crises.
I don’t understand why you people don’t see that!?
bluto Says:
24 October 2008 at 7:28 PM.
juat think, how will it help the backbone, raising taxes on small business will cause a lot of layoffs. you know those backbones that do most of the work and paying in this country. liberals are like alcoholics that are on a binge they dont listen to any common sense, they think they know everything, and they annoy everybody else, it is a disease
bluto Says:
24 October 2008 at 7:44 PM.
http://www.eyeblast.tv/Public/Video.aspx?rsrcID=2036
VERY INTERESTING
hope he was able to get to his granny so she could fill out the early voting ballot before she met her maker. even though legally it will not count if she dies before nov 4, i am sure they will find a way to count that. or at least put her on the rolls of acorn.
Hussein_Dishonorable Says:
24 October 2008 at 11:56 PM.
Hey Juat Think: You should really learn how a computer works. There is such a thing as “Spell Check” you know. You don’t do yourself any favors by looking like a complete idiot when you post!
For the “meat” of it: Anyone who looks at Hussein’s plan and doesn’t get that he’s going to let the current tax breaks expire, and then at some point in the future re-lower taxes isn’t reading it clearly. Or they must have attended one of the schools Hussein funded! By allowing the current tax breaks to go away, everyone’s taxes will go up! Then if he keeps his promises (because politicians always do that…right?) he’ll lower them on some people. I don’t need his word on taxes, I can look at his votes in the record of the U.S Senate. He voted to raise taxes on people making 42K a year. That doesn’t sound very rich to me. STOP DRINKING THE KOOL AID !!!!!! Politicians will tell you anything to get your vote. You should go back and look at all the stuff Bill Clinton promised and didn’t do. The list is staggering!
Sofa King Ray Todd Ed Says:
25 October 2008 at 1:11 AM.
Hussein_Dishonorable, I’m listening … where/how was the natural born citizen for a child of military parents, born outside the US, settled? Is there some law that you can cite? Again, the question is not citizen, its the “natural born” part … so I’m interested to see it if you have it.
Hussein_Dishonorable Says:
25 October 2008 at 3:14 AM.
Interested to see if I have it? I have only been posting here for a few days, but know this, I know my shit! Although I did some extra digging just for you…… I wanted to paste it all here, to save you the trouble of searching for yourself!
Info aquired from: Charles Signorile February 28th, 2008 – ACLU – U.S. Congress – U.S. State Dept. – U.S. Constitution (Fourteenth Amendment) Case Law from U.S. Supreme Court
The U.S. State Department further clarified this by stating that:
c. Despite widespread popular belief, U.S. military installations abroad and U.S. diplomatic or consular facilities are not part of the United States within the meaning of the 14th Amendment. A child born on the premises of such a facility is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and does not acquire U.S. citizenship by reason of birth.
Most arguments against McCain’s eligibility will point to this statute as proof that McCain is not a natural born citizen within the scope of the 14th Amendment. However this statute is very broad and was meant to clarify popular assumptions regarding all military bases abroad, not specific ones. For example, a child born to parents residing on a military installation in the Virgin Islands would be considered a United States citizen by birth because the Virgin Islands are a territory of the United States and subject to its jurisdiction. Likewise in 1936 when John McCain was born, the Panama Canal Zone was considered a United States territory, and therefore under the jurisdiction of the United States.
Article II states that “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.” Article II left to Congress the role of defining citizenship, including citizenship by reason of birth. Rogers v. Bellei, 401 U.S. 815, 828 (1970). Many decades later, the Fourteenth Amendment set a floor on citizenship, overruled the Dred Scott decision, and provided that all born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, were citizens. Nonetheless, subject to the floor of the Fourteenth Amendment, it has always been left to Congress to define who may be a citizen by reason of birth (or naturalization proceedings, for that matter). Id. at 829–30.
At the time of Senator McCain’s birth, the pertinent citizenship provision prescribed that “[a]ny child hereafter born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, whose father or mother or both at the time of the birth of such child is a citizen of the United States, is declared to be a citizen of the United States.” Act of May 24, 1934, Pub. L. No. 73-250, 48 Stat. 797. The Supreme Court has interpreted the phrase “out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States” in this statute to be the converse of the phrase “in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” in the Fourteenth Amendment, and therefore to encompass all those not granted citizenship directly by the Fourteenth Amendment. [Footnote: United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 687 (1898) (“The words ‘in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,’ in the first sentence of the fourteenth amendment of the constitution, must be presumed to have been understood and intended by the Congress which proposed the amendment … [as] the converse of the words ‘out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States,’ as habitually used in the naturalization acts.”)]
Under this view, Senator McCain was a citizen at birth. In 1937, to remove any doubt as to persons in Senator McCain’s circumstances in the Canal Zone, Congress enacted 8 U.S.C. 1403(a), which declared that persons in Senator McCain’s circumstances are citizens by virtue of their birth, thereby retroactively rendering Senator McCain a natural born citizen, if he was not one already. This order finds it highly probable, for the purposes of this motion for provisional relief, that Senator McCain is a natural born citizen. Plaintiff has not demonstrated the likelihood of success on the merits necessary to warrant the drastic remedy he seeks.
Hussein_Dishonorable Says:
25 October 2008 at 3:20 AM.
Got one more for you…….
The first Congress enacted a citizenship law (Act of March 26, 1790, Chapter 3, Section 1, Statute 104) that stated “the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens.” This gives clear evidence that the framers of the Constitution, some of whom served in the first Congress, understood “natural born citizens” to be those people who were born U.S. citizens regardless of where they were born.
HELLO Says:
25 October 2008 at 3:08 PM.
Everyone is fighting about this. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion but they should have everything to back it up so that they don’t look stupid. We’re all American and have to live with one president for 4 years…. I think everyone should take a closer look to everyone elses
opinions and understand where they are coming from. As different people we have different problems and views but just think how something might work out for someone else better or maybe the country as a whole better than it would for you. We need to think do we want someone hypocritical like Obama or someone who stick with the truth and doesn’t change it and gives his records when needed, but that’s just my opinion.
Sofa King Ray Todd Ed Says:
25 October 2008 at 9:50 PM.
Ok, everything you cite I was already aware of. I was hoping you had something more definitive that would settle this once and for all. Unfortunately all that stuff can be interpreted in two different ways … that he is natural born, or that he is not. It would be nice if congress took this up but I doubt they will because natural born only really matters for someone running for president that wasn’t born on US soil, which is rare enough to not warrant the time invested.
Good point hello, but let me paraphrase what you are saying .. do we want someone that inspires us, or do we want a crochety old man like McCain that is mean and nasty, has no real plan for anything, doesn’t have the stamina to be president, makes knee-jerk decisions like suspending his campaign because he cant do two things at once, and has no real argument as to why he should be president other than because Obama is bad.
Ray Says:
26 October 2008 at 3:36 PM.
Sofa King Ray Todd Ed said:
“[McCain]…..has no real argument as to why he should be president other than because Obama is bad.”
I would say that’s accurate on every account. McCain isn’t the answer to our prayers and Obama is bad….make that worse than bad. He has ALL the answers….and they’re all so clear. That’s where I have an issue. Where did he get all of these detailed answers to the country’s problems? School? Teaching? Other Congressmen? It certainly wasn’t experience.
Academics always have theory wrapped up so clean and neat…..if we do this, we get that. Why would anybody, who’s been on their own (without the safety net of government social assistance or parents) every been fooled into thinking he has the answers. HE HAS ZERO PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE AS A LEADER!!!
HELLO Says:
27 October 2008 at 1:22 PM.
I found out something else,… Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has been implicated in a variety of “scandals” during the course of his campaign. Some of them relate to business deals and professional relationships from Obama’s hometown of Chicago, a city with a reputation for corrupt politics, while others focus on gaffes and misstatements made by the candidate on the campaign trail or possible exaggerations in advertisements and campaign literature. Obama also, is guilty of infanticide. I recieved this info from
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/10/is_obama_guilty_of_infanticide.html It states that “According to Sarah Palin, Barack Obama’s position on abortion is “so far left, it’s way beyond the mainstream.” The Republican vice presidential hopeful says that she is “most troubled” by Obama’s opposition, as an Illinois state senator, to a “Born Alive” bill that would have guaranteed medical protection to children born as a result of a bungled abortion. The Obama campaign describes the Palin attack as “dishonest” and “insulting.”
Is it true that Obama was ever in favor of withholding medical treatment for babies born alive as a result of a botched abortion?
The Facts
The “born alive” controversy is one of the most emotional — and legally complex — issues of the 2008 presidential campaign. Palin’s attack on Obama echoes, in somewhat politer language, the accusations of “infanticide” made by various anti-abortion activists. It stems from Obama’s “No” votes on a series of bills that were introduced into the Illinois state Senate between 2001 and 2003 to define the term “born alive infant.”
Under the definition employed in the bills, the term “born alive” meant “any member of the species homo sapiens” expelled or extracted from his or her mother that exhibits “a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles.”
Pro-abortion groups, such as Planned Parenthood, viewed the legislation as part of a broader attempt to give fetuses the same rights as pregnant women and to impose criminal sanctions on doctors offering abortion services. They pointed out that Illinois state law already offered protection to babies born as the result of bungled abortions. A 1975 Illinois law requires doctors performing abortions on so-called “viable fetuses”–i.e. a fetus that might be able to survive outside the mother’s body — to take steps in advance to ensure adequate medical treatment in the event of a live birth.
The 1975 law requires the presence on such occasions of a second doctor whose primary responsibility is the provision of “immediate medical care for any child born alive as a result of the abortion.”
Anti-abortion groups argue that the 1975 law needed to be strengthened as it was full of “loopholes.” The “born alive” bills under consideration by the Illinois state Senate — and subsequently adopted at the federal level — would have effectively done away with the distinction between “viable” and “non-viable” fetuses. According to Douglas Johnson, legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee, the 1975 law makes the doctor performing the abortion responsible for determining whether a fetus is “viable” or “non-viable.”
Obama has depicted the Illinois bills as an assault on the principles of Roe vs. Wade, the Supreme Court decision that guaranteed a woman’s right to choose whether to terminate her pregnancy within certain limits. The “pro-life” camp says that the Illinois senator has offered shifting explanations for his opposition to the “born alive” legislation.
Obama has never made any secret of his “pro-choice” views, and has a 100 percent voting record from NARAL and other abortion rights groups. On the other hand, he has heatedly denied ever being in favor of “withholding life-saving support from an infant born alive.” He now says that he would have supported a federal “Born Alive” bill, which included very similar language to the later versions of the Illinois bill. The Pinocchio Test
Reasonable people can differ on whether the 1975 Illinois state law needed to be strengthened, and the likely effect of the various “Born Alive” bills rejected by the Illinois legislature between 2001 and 2003. But it is unfair to accuse Obama of supporting the withdrawal of medical treatment from babies born as the result of a botched abortion. He has never adopted such an “extreme” position.” It’s all right there and that’s exactly why arack Obama shouldn’t be our president.
HELLO Says:
27 October 2008 at 1:25 PM.
Also look at this website: http://www.jillstanek.com/bio.html it looks further into this as someone’s baby was killed in and old utility closet. I mean if you don’t think Obama’s bad after that well then, what the matter with you. He’s killing babies!
Eric Says:
27 October 2008 at 10:10 PM.
Citizen or not. Why do we not have the right to ask for proof? You want to be president, then prove you meet the requirements. Is that too much to ask? Who is looking out for us? This guy filed a lawsuit simply asking that Obama prove he is a citizen. And some of you idiots are mad? Screw you . You deserve what you get if he is elected. Some of you want him so bad simply because you think you can get something for nothing. Too frigin lazy to work for a living. If he is elected I hope and pray that racial wars start in every city and you stupid whites that voted for him see this race for what they really are: EVIL God made them black for a reason. So those with eyes can see.
bluto Says:
27 October 2008 at 11:30 PM.
if osama wins and screws this country up he will blame it on the “failed Bush era”, if he dosent win, he will say “racist America” either way he will put the blame on others. hope those of you that are voting for it know what you are doing to this country by voting for it, kinda strange electing a person to the highest office in the land, and you do not even know him, when its all over remember we all warned you, but you will blame it on someone else ………. dumb asses
Show me da money Says:
28 October 2008 at 3:35 PM.
Blue Toe, we know exactly what we are doing voting for Obama. Maybe someday you will see the brilliance of what we are doing for this country, but I expect it will take you a while. Its not your fault though, the repubs have you so scared you can’t think straight. So I totally understand where you are coming from.
Show me da money Says:
28 October 2008 at 3:45 PM.
Are you a moron hello? the article summarizes the fact check as:
But it is unfair to accuse Obama of supporting the withdrawal of medical treatment from babies born as the result of a botched abortion. He has never adopted such an “extreme” position.
And the gives 2 pinochios to Palin for lying.
Go back and re-read the last paragraph of your cut and paste.
bluto Says:
28 October 2008 at 8:11 PM.
show you da moonie, i can tell by your name you are another handout waiting in line, i can tell by your narrow minded comments that you are a lemming and or a parrot, havent read an original line you have posted. i hope for my sake you lose so you can come back in here and say what a racist we all are, cause if osama wins most of us here will not be able to afford the internet that your al gore invented because lots of us working people will be outta of a job, and i know that is ok with you moonie, you libs are a bunch of biggoted self serving hate mongers. most all citys that are dominated by libs have a huge unemployment problem, crime problem and insane taxes, i guess you would like to see that nation wide………..dumb ass
Show me da money Says:
28 October 2008 at 11:46 PM.
When Obama wins, most people will have more money to spend, and thus everyone that can afford the internet today will be able to afford it in the future. If Obama were to lose I would never say it was because of racist reasons … the way I look at it race cuts both ways … Obama gets more black votes because he is black, and he gets less white votes because he is black … so racism would not be the reason if he lost.
This whole socialism crap is so blown out of proportion because the republicans want to scare everyone, as usual. Look at the endorsements Obama is getting … lots of rich people, lots of really smart people … not exactly lemmings or parrots or people that advocate socialism/marxism/communism/every scare word you can think of ism. Most of the Bush/republican policies have been terrible for this country, and yet McCain has not really been able to explain how he is fundamentally different. McCain is a republican at heart with republican values … likes war, maintains power by scaring the constituents, panders to the rich, out of touch with the middle class, ignores the constitution, exudes american arrogance in policy and strategy decisions, abuses power … selects a VP that appears to like abusing power as well … the same republican crap.
I would rather see an “inexperienced” Obama moving in the right direction, than an “experienced” McCain moving in the wrong direction. I don’t really buy into McCain’s experience … if he has it he hasn’t really used it for anything worthwhile yet. Its just overblown hype … he can’t run a campaign worth a crap, he makes lots of bad decisions (suspending his campaign, choosing Palin, running an almost exclusively negative campaign, etc.). It would be sad if he won the election, nobody really wants him. Most people that vote for him are just voting against Obama. So if he is elected we end up with a president that nobody really wants or is excited by. Then when he is incapacitated, we get a clueless soccer mom that has surpassed Dan Quayle as the national joke (and I really didn’t think that was possible).
So, we will see next week. If Obama wins, he will have a lot of excited, enthusiastic, energetic supporters that will help him be successful and help this country move forward. If McCain wins, pretty much everyone (including the anti-Obama’s) goes back to ignoring the president, bitching about how everything sucks, and waiting for the next election.
Just Think Says:
29 October 2008 at 9:03 AM.
VERY WELL SAID!!…Show me da money!
HELLO Says:
29 October 2008 at 1:26 PM.
Show me da money are you stupid???? Obama just wants to help his kind. Do you seriously think he’s going to treat everyone equal?? I don’t think so, not as the first black president. Hee’s going to only care about his people and we’re going to be the ones suffereing including you. You are true that most people are only voting for McCain because we’re against Obama but it’s better than living to pay for someone elses life. Sarah Palin shouldn’t be criticized because of her family. I have a family and you have one. Just because she’s a woman doesn’t mean she won’t do a good job. She knows what most people want because she has a family and can relate to us. Her daughters pregnancy does not show her capability of being in charge. Teens everywhere her age are getting pregnant so it’s not like omg she didnt just because she’s a political figures daughter. It just shows that no famil;y is perfect and I for one don’t want someone who thinks he’s perfect for president. I’d perfer someone who has experience such as McCain and can be a VP worth having. I for one think they will do a good job. Way better than Obama ever could. He seems untrustworthy and he’s a hypocrit. Have you ever watched his interviews and such? Cuz he darts around questions like there’s no tommrow and he’ll say one thing about the war or whatever and change it to something else to make the other person happy. Obama is constantly thrashing McCain during debates saying unlike sentor McCain or John McCain does this while I do this…. no…. I don’t like that it makes it seem like he’s running his campaign on how well he can hurt McCain. and McCain doesn’t do that to Obama he tries not to mention Obama’s name trying to get his point across not throwing someone elses point out the window and stepping all over it because he doesn’t care what Obama thinks he only cares about the people and their well being. That’s what our president should be doing.
HELLO Says:
29 October 2008 at 1:34 PM.
um Show me the money, you are factual about people not wanting McCain but only voting for his because he’s not Obama but your not factual about Obama or Palin. Sarah Palin is a working mother who has a family and should not be thrashed for it. She should know what Americans want considering she has delt with the school system through her children and knows what it’s like to be a working mother. Just because her daughter is pregnant doesn’t mean anything. Teens everywhere her age are getting pregnant. Are you going to hate all them or just her because she’s a political figures daughter. I mean everyone can find a way to get around there parents and you can’t say you didn’t so something you weren’t supposed to. As for Obama,… he’s an incompitant hypocrit. HE darts around questions like there’s no tommrow and changes his answer from one interview to the next. He is constantly thrashing McCain would couldn’t give a damn about what Obama thinks about him. McCain only cares about the people and he doesn’t sit there and say oh, Obama does this this and that….no….he doesn’t you want to know why? Because his campaign isn’t being run by the fact that he can get supporters by saying stuff about Obama. Number 1 if he does he’ll be called a racist. How come Obama can’t be called a racist against McCain. I mean I know I’ve heard what he’s said have you? You don’t hear about it because Obama can get away with everything. He’s only going to be looking out for his people anyway while we’re paying for it. I don’t want a hypocrit for president. McCain cares about the people and that’s what I want for my president.
stonerjoe Says:
29 October 2008 at 5:39 PM.
Show me da money said: “…..republican values … likes war…”
Do you mean like half-stepped attempts in Bosnia & Somalia that cost American lives without any gain to our country? Or do you mean like the 100s of millions of dollars in cruise missile attacks in the middle east with zero accomplishments in security or stabilization (OPERATION DESERT FOX)? Because that was Clinton.
Show me da money said: “….maintains power by scaring the constituents….”
You mean like stating “McCain’s plan will make our economics worse”? Or do you mean by saying by voting for McCain, we’ll have 8 more years (not 4, but
of the same? Because that’s Obama.
Show me da money said: “…panders to the rich, out of touch with the middle class…”
You mean like suggest a $700 billion dollar bail out of the rich and poor at the cost of the MIDDLE CLASS? Because that’s BOTH parties.
Show me da money says: “…ignores the constitution…”
Do you mean like the following quote from Bill Clinton:
“When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of individual freedom to Americans, it was assumed that the Americans who had that freedom would use it responsibly…. [However, now] there’s a lot of irresponsibility. And so a lot of people say there’s too much freedom. When personal freedom’s being abused, you have to move to limit it.”
Show me day money said: “…exudes american arrogance in policy and strategy decisions…”
Do you mean like telling Pakistan that we will invade your border as we wish? Because that’s Obama…again.
As a matter of fact, by YOUR standards, nearly your entire post is a scare tactic. You mention the socialism issue being blown out of proportion, but then you continue with two completely dramatic paragraphs with absolutely zero facts (other than you are willing to have an unexperienced Obama in the Whitehouse). By the way, the responses to each of your alligations are researchable facts.
Show me da money Says:
29 October 2008 at 6:06 PM.
Ok stoner, take a toke and relax, I’ll help you through this. Try to put your bong down long enough to concentrate on this election, Bill Clinton is not running so what he did during his time is, well, not really relevent to this election.
- War – being in Iraq for the next 100 years (McCain)
- Scaring the constituents – Whipping people into a frenzy where they shout “Kill him” (McCain)
- Out of touch with middle class – A health care policy advisor for the McCain campaign told a newspaper reporter that nobody in the United States is technically uninsured, because everyone has access to hospital emergency rooms. (John Goodman, advisor to McCain)
- Out of touch with the economy – The US is in a “mental recession” and is a nation of whiners (Phil Gramm, advisor to John McCain)
- Its the economy stupid – The fundamentals of the economy are strong (John McCain himself, just before the market meltdown)
- Panders to the rich – Wants to keep Bush’s tax cuts for the rich (McCain)
etc. etc.
Oh, and one I forgot to mention:
- Non-existant vetting process – Anyone that hires Carly Fiorina as an advisor gets what they deserve (as McCain finally learned), lol, she is such a dunderhead.
Oh and to clear up one thing you are confused on, Obama (and Palin) did not exactly say that we would invade Pakistan borders as we wish, Obama said if we had actionable intelligence on Al Queda/Osama Bin Laden, and Pakistan could not or would not act, then we would. I still stand behind that 100%, as apparently does Bush since that is what the US is doing now.
I hope this helps Joe, and I hope you are not too stoned to read it.
Show me da money Says:
29 October 2008 at 7:36 PM.
umm, hello??? I didn’t thrash Palin for being a working mother, I didn’t say anything about her pregnant daughter, I think you must have some standard response for people that suggest Palin wasn’t a good choice and you just paste it no matter what was said … you’re busted, lol.
Ray Says:
30 October 2008 at 12:05 AM.
Show me da money,
You didn’t mention Clinton, but you did make general remarks against the republican party. Is it not fair for stoner to reply in the same manner?
In Iraq for 100 years?! Did Obama say this or is a dramitization?
McCain persueded those people to chant “Kill him?” Did you watch the entire rally, did you get that second hand or did you just take the clip that shows them chanting. Question: Have Obama supporters publicly-stated, over-the-top crude comments? McCain IS THE ONLY CANDIDATE to rebuke such comments made by his supporters. Obama just sits back and lets it happen….fact.
Oh…and to clear up one other thing YOU are confused on, we’ve been going over the border for years…fact. Bush just hasn’t been proclaiming it on national TV. It’s sort of policy that allows to keep the legitamate government of that country to not be publicly criticized by the world (and it’s own people) as weak and in essence, allow it to remain an ally. The “in-you-face approach creates axis states.
And one last thing: Please, if you reply directly to me, please show the same respect I’ve granted you. I don’t believe in your point of view, as much as you don’t believe in mine. Unsolicited personal attacks, show nothing more than an immature character that lacks substance and an uneducated scrub that clearly has nothing of any value to add. I believe the common term for that behavior is “troll.” Anyway, good night and God bless.
conspiracy Says:
30 October 2008 at 1:42 AM.
Dude Mr. Berg, have you been to Indonesia and have you lived in Menteng where Barack Obama lived and went to SEKOLAH DASAR NEGERI MENTENG 01 or what you called “Besuki”? ….yeah…that’s right….I DON’T THINK SO. Cuz you are SMART ENOUGH to NOT GO TO SCHOOL in a 3rd WORLD COUNTRY.
Barack was ANAK MENTENG!!! That is awesome, dude. Besuki is my elementary’s neighbour! Well, about 4 blocks away (we’re talking NYC blocks not other cities).
If you all learn about MENTENG, the former president of INDOENSIA “SOEHARTO” lives in that area for gazzellions yearrr. Yeah… all of the PRESIDENT’s kids, grandkids and elite kids live round the area but they didn’t even want to send their kids to a freakin PUBLIC schools. Only the locals who CAN’T afford to go to the PRIVATE school send their kids to the PUBLIC school cuz the PUBLIC school system in INDOENSIA SUCKS. AMERICANS should be thankful that they DON’T HAVE TO PAY TUITION TO GO TO PUBLIC ELEMENTARY/HIGH SCHOOL.
Many embassies are in Menteng area, the housing for many Ambassadors are in the area. But anyways, MENTENG area has soooo many freakin EXPATRIATES. The INDONESIAN’S respect EXPATRIATES like their own, even more respectful. Im sure BESUKI’s PRINCIPAL was super nice to BARACK’s family cuz their family is down to earth and live in the hood. They are not like those SNOBBY EXPATRIATES who segregate their kids to go to PRIVATE COOL KIDS SCHOOL.
And dude, you are talking about PUBLIC school system in the 3rd world country. OFF COURSE THEY WILL TAKE anybody to be their STUDENTS. Who cares if they are CITIZEN or NOT as long as one of the parent is INDONESIAN. Barack’s parents might not able to pay him to go to a PRIVATE school so he sent him to BESUKI. BESUKI is a good school, top public elementary school in Jakarta Pusat with less tuition than MANY PRIVATE schools around the area. Yeah, you freakin pay TUITION to go to the PUBLIC ELEMENTARY school!!!! Imagine that!
So CUT THE BS. He is NOT INDONESIAN. Yes he went to school in INDO but dude, it didn’t MEAN anything. As a GOOD SAMARITAN, who doesn’t want to send their KIDS to school to educate them??!?!?!??! You can go to school in INDONESIA as long as you can afford to pay tuition!!!
Smug smirky smile Says:
6 November 2008 at 10:12 PM.
What ever happened to that wack job that thought he could bring a lawsuit against Obama for some misguided reasons. I know Obama totally owned him and humiliated him, but did he finally tuck his tail between his legs and go away for good? lol
bluto Says:
6 November 2008 at 11:21 PM.
yes, smug, i am sure he has tucked his tail and taken away a place for you to stick your lips
bluto Says:
6 November 2008 at 11:22 PM.
oh, wait, he is not a liberal, guess you still have a place to put your lips
ruthlessasshole Says:
22 November 2008 at 8:23 AM.
I would like nothing better than to scare up Palin, and do a little "background checking" with her. All silliness aside, She and McCain together were probably not the best pair republicans had to offer, but I think she would have been a better choice as a running mate with Ron Paul. Or even as the President herself. Not to mention she actually looks good, and could survive on her own in the wilderness if need be. She also has more experience than Assholebama, even if the state she is empowered by isn't the strongest on the nation. Like Alaska, the state she is from, she has many untapped resources, and I doubt that Assholebama would have a chance against her next time.
ruthlessasshole Says:
22 November 2008 at 8:36 AM.
Why apologize to anyone? Say what's on your mind like an American, only pussies say they're sorry. You have the FREEDOM to say what's on your mind, so long as it is not in a threatening manner. Fuck these dems, with their badge-less rank-less dirge. let them feast on their own words like feces, and live in the detritus they call homes, for that is what they have to look forward to when Assholebama takes the white house!
ruthlessasshole Says:
22 November 2008 at 8:43 AM.
Let's not forget that neither Assholebama's parents to endure slavery in this country. Lately there have been so many parallels drawn between Martin Luther King, who is a descendant of slaves, and Barack Obamasshole, but many people forget that Obama's family did not endure slavery here in this country, nor did he have any semblance of the dream MLK had. Unless you count pipe dreams, for which I wish this whole election was one.
ruthlessasshole Says:
22 November 2008 at 8:51 AM.
Written like a true democrat. Just say the same old shit over and over again, and drop big college words(also known as five-dollar words) like ecumenical, and Voila! You have another shit-for-brains pre-fab dyed-in-the-wool, fuck-the-working-man-in-the-ass democrat. Go back to school, and take some language and creative writing classes. Because you, and people like you, truly put the "ass" in "class". You may have written this more clearly if you didn't masturbate with one hand, and hold a picture of Assholebama in the other.
ruthlessasshole Says:
22 November 2008 at 8:58 AM.
To bluto: Obviously you were either misled by the title, or put off by the huge banner that says "UP YOURS OBAMA" If this wasn't an Obama hate site, we would have nothing to talk about, and therefore would have to make our own. By the way, if you love Assholebama so much, uhhhhhhhhh….Why the fuck are you here?
Xtreme Teen Success.. Empowering Principles For Every Child's Success. | 7Wins.eu Says:
11 June 2009 at 11:19 AM.
[...] Fear: Does It Hold You Back? | The Jungle of Life Indiana Senate Passes SR42 Claiming Sovereignty under the 10th Amendment | Tenth Amendment Center Social Workers Respond to Gov. Sarah Palinâ
ChimpChump Says:
11 June 2009 at 8:52 PM.
Showing your ass",
I love coming back to you lazy-ass liberals who were running your mouths off 8 weeks ago about your boy. Where are you now?
Your boy has quadrupled the debt by spending $540,000,000.00 A DAY! Where are you now? It's exactly because of you and other idiots like you, that we have turned 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, into the Kremiln West.
Keep cashing your welfare check, eating your government cheese, drinking the kool-aid and watching PMSNBC.
ChimpChump Says:
11 June 2009 at 8:52 PM.
"Showing your ass",
I love coming back to you lazy-ass liberals who were running your mouths off 8 weeks ago about your boy. Where are you now?
Your boy has quadrupled the debt by spending $540,000,000.00 A DAY! Where are you now? It's exactly because of you and other idiots like you, that we have turned 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, into the Kremiln West.
Keep cashing your welfare check, eating your government cheese, drinking the kool-aid and watching PMSNBC.
ChimpChump Says:
11 June 2009 at 8:54 PM.
Where are you now? Hey big mouth, how do you like it now?
You complete jack-ass! Come back and defend your president now!
ChimpChump Says:
11 June 2009 at 10:35 PM.
Jonathan Rochele? I wouldn't be bragging with a name like that….Nancy.
ChimpChump Says:
11 June 2009 at 10:38 PM.
Don't kill the messenger, just because you disagree with the message.
Trembleman Says:
11 June 2009 at 11:09 PM.
He has won, and the things you mention have indeed come to pass. Despite his having won, he continues to say "racist America" with code words such as "hope" and "change."
Trembleman Says:
18 October 2009 at 5:48 AM.
Professor,
Not only have you submitted your thesis, but you have submitted it three times in the same submission!
I am well aware of the lowered standards for public schools these days, and thus for instructors as well, so your missive should more than pass muster with the board of Regents. Perhaps The One could give you a slot on his team of educational advisers educational advisers educational advisers?
ChimpChump Says:
19 October 2009 at 12:07 PM.
"Secondly,.. Hussein is only a name,.. it can’t hurt you!… There is so much more to Obama then skin color, or a name,.. you obviously have never lesson to any of his speeches."
AA Flight 11
First plane sacrificed; hit the North Tower of the WTC
Walid Al Shehri
Wail Alsheri (aka Waleed Alsheri)
Mohammad Atta
Aabdul Alomari
Satam Sugami
UA Flight 175
Second plane sacrificed; hit the South Tower of the WTC
Marawn Alshehhi
Fayez Ahmed
Mohald Alshehri
Hamza Al Ghamdi
Ahmed Al Ghamdi
AA Flight 77
Third plane sacrificed; hit the Pentagon
Khalid Almihdhar
Majed Moqued
Nawaf Al Hazmi
Salem Al Hazmi
UA Flight 93
Fourth plane sacrificed; crashed into the ground in Pennsylvania
Ahmed Al Haznawi
Ahmed Alnami
Ziad Jarrah
Saeed Alghamdi
Yea, what's in a name.
ChimpChump Says:
19 October 2009 at 12:17 PM.
Dude…..I proclaim November as "Love an Expatriate Dirtbag Day"!!!??!!
Dude, have a nice freaking day.
ChimpChump Says:
19 October 2009 at 12:17 PM.
Dude…..I proclaim November as "Love an Expatriate Dirtbag Month"!!!??!!
Dude, have a nice freaking day.
ChimpChump Says:
19 October 2009 at 12:24 PM.
Funny how, of all of the "back and forth" nonsense in this thread, bluto appears to have been the most factually correct in his assessment of the president.
Trembleman Says:
19 October 2009 at 2:08 PM.
"Brilliance?"
Dude.
Yeah, I totally get that you've been brainwashed my this guy and his hollow stances. Or maybe it's that you need to be led around by a power-addled wind-up toy spouting the shibboleths of "hope" and "change."
Trembleman Says:
20 October 2009 at 3:03 AM.
And where are the media watchdogs when it comes to keeping track of The One's spending spree? They were right there to point the finger of blame when Bush was working on setting up systems to combat terrorism and to protect our country.
Trembleman Says:
20 October 2009 at 5:58 AM.
Indeed, that's what happened during the election and what is happening right now. Adult children are thinking precisely what their "mommy" candidate is telling them to think, and woe be to anyone who tells them differently.
Trembleman Says:
3 November 2009 at 4:32 AM.
Couldn't see the video, as it has been removed. How come?
ChimpChump Says:
4 November 2009 at 1:00 PM.
T-man,
Do you ever get the feeling that we're all alone? I guess you and I are the last ones standing.
ChimpChump Says:
4 November 2009 at 1:08 PM.
Show me the money, Visionary, Louissa, CPR, et al:
Where are you all now? T-man, myself and others on BOS, have remained steadfast in our opposition to your savior and his radical marxist policies, and as a result of the elections yesterday in VA and NJ, a referendum on your president has begun. Don't be skeered! You idiots took a verbal smacking around when he WAS popular among the left and the uninformed…imagine the beat-down that is in store for you now!
Come Back!
Have a nice day!
Trembleman Says:
4 November 2009 at 3:52 PM.
Funny, I was thinking the same thing last night. What happened to Nobody Knows, ruthless asshole, etc.? Many of the more promising posters appear to have disappeared into the nether, much like The One's promises of bipartisanship.
True, CPR stayed around 'till certain BOS contributors refused to engage with him any longer, but that was, for me, along the lines of following my rule never to argue with a madman.
But what happened to the ones who, every so often, would actually write things worth discussing? Have people become so cowardly they refuse to stand up for their beliefs? Then maybe I've been wrong about the fortitude of Americans, and they truly have decided it is preferable to bow down to The One rather than maintain their individuality.
Trembleman Says:
6 November 2009 at 1:09 AM.
Hey CC,
Funny how I haven't seen any new posts from anyone for the last week or so…I'm wondering, is it because the economy is in a nosedive, and The One's supporters are embarrassed to admit that perhaps their chosen savior might be a teensy bit responsible? As you observed, it looks as if you and I are the last ones standing.
Trembleman Says:
9 March 2010 at 3:07 PM.
They flushed that down years ago. Now they're trying to apply the Dred Scott decision to taxpayers.
Trembleman Says:
9 March 2010 at 2:56 PM.
Your crystal ball appears to be in working order. Your predictions have been proven true, and our country is suffering the effects of The One's meddling.
Trembleman Says:
3 April 2010 at 6:18 PM.
I always enjoy listening to this one. It reflects precisely the dearth of knowledge and wisdom encouraged by the consumption of mass media.
Trembleman Says:
14 April 2010 at 2:06 PM.
Yep, I live in one of those cities, which does indeed contain a significant number of unemployed residents. Interestingly, the majority of these unemployed people, based upon my observation, supported during the election and continue to support nearly 1 1/2 years later The One in his current capacity.
Does the majority of the perennially unemployed support him because they believe he is good for the economy, that he will assist them in getting work? No, they support him for just the opposite reason: that his policies make it easy for them not to work, in perpetuity.
Trembleman Says:
25 May 2010 at 6:32 AM.
If The One were Pinocchio, his nose would have outgrown the white house by now.
ChimpChump Says:
25 May 2010 at 11:34 AM.
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Monday shows that 25% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Forty-three percent (43%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -18 (see trends).
Just 27% are even somewhat confident that Congress knows what it’s doing when addressing that nation’s economic challenges. That figure includes only 6% who are Very Confident that Congress knows what it’s doing.
I'm just sayin'.
ChimpChump Says:
25 May 2010 at 11:34 AM.
Cont.
Following passage of health care, enthusiasm for the president among Democrats soared. Today, however, just 49% of Democrats Strongly Approve of Obama’s performance. That’s down from a high of 65%. It remains to be seen whether this is a temporary aberration or the beginning of a lasting change.
Sixty-three percent (63%) of voters nationwide favor repeal of the health care law. That’s the highest level of support for repeal yet measured.
The Presidential Approval Index is calculated by subtracting the number who Strongly Disapprove from the number who Strongly Approve. It is updated daily at 9:30 a.m. Eastern (sign up for free daily e-mail update). Updates are also available on Twitter and Facebook.
Overall, 44% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the president's performance. Fifty-four percent (55%) disapprove. The Rasmussen Reports Media Meter shows that media coverage of the President has been 51% positive over the past week.
Goldie22Cain Says:
2 July 2010 at 11:42 PM.
Some specialists argue that business loans aid a lot of people to live their own way, just because they are able to feel free to buy necessary goods. Moreover, different banks present college loan for different persons.
Trembleman Says:
21 July 2010 at 5:18 AM.
When you suggest The One wants to help "his kind" and "his people," I trust you realize that he does not see color at all except as it relates to votes and money. Not that I disagree with the majority of your points, but it is ludicrous to suggest The One is slavish to anything but green campaign dollars and "green" tribalism…which ultimately amounts to the same thing: more capital in the democrats' coffers.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.


